ESFIX vs. GMOQX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ESFIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund) and GMOQX (GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, ESFIX returned 10.01%/yr vs 17.18%/yr for GMOQX. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESFIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GMOQX.

Performance

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESFIX achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.19% return.

ESFIX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 2.31%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: -2.43%
• 10Y*: -1.33%
• ALL TIME*: -1.06%

GMOQX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 4.16%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ESFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund	2.70%	7.09%	7.94%	13.03%	-21.54%	-17.02%
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	8.19%	22.45%	12.60%	17.76%	-16.26%	-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ESFIX and GMOQX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between ESFIX and GMOQX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ESFIX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESFIX

ESFIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
ESFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ESFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ESFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ESFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ESFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

GMOQX

GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESFIX	GMOQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	3.76	-3.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	6.64	-5.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.88	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	5.22	-3.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	21.93	-17.25

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESFIX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESFIX drawdown since its inception was -48.22%, which is greater than GMOQX's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESFIX and GMOQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESFIX	GMOQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.22%	-31.41%	-16.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-3.82%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.18%	-9.02%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.15%	-1.42%	-22.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-9.41%	-7.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	0.91%	+0.39%

Volatility

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) at 0.99%. This indicates that ESFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESFIX	GMOQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	0.99%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	4.00%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.17%	5.31%	+3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.24%	10.72%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.34%	10.72%	-2.38%

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESFIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESFIX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

ESFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than GMOQX's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund	7.79%	3.70%	4.37%	7.75%	6.83%	7.62%	5.38%	8.15%	6.58%	5.63%	1.37%
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	4.57%	6.37%	6.23%	10.36%	13.87%	7.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESFIX and GMOQX in my portfolio?

ESFIX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESFIX or GMOQX?

ESFIX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to GMOQX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESFIX dropped -48.22% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.