ESFIX vs. ESDIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund (ESDIX).

ESFIX is managed by Ashmore. It was launched on Jun 23, 2014. ESDIX is managed by Ashmore. It was launched on Jun 14, 2020.

Performance

ESFIX vs. ESDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund (ESDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESFIX vs. ESDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund	0.26%	7.09%	7.94%	13.03%	-21.54%	-18.83%	13.11%
ESDIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund	0.00%	1.54%	6.15%	5.31%	-9.66%	-4.21%	4.12%

Returns By Period

ESFIX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 2.15%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: -3.42%
• 10Y*: -0.88%

ESDIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESFIX vs. ESDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESFIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ESDIX's 0.67% expense ratio.

ESDIX

Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund

ESFIX

Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund

Return for Risk

ESFIX vs. ESDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESFIX

ESFIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
ESFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ESFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ESFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ESFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ESFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESFIX vs. ESDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund (ESFIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund (ESDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESFIX	ESDIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.03	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESFIX	ESDIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between ESFIX and ESDIX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ESFIX vs. ESDIX - Dividend Comparison

ESFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while ESDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund	7.37%	3.70%	4.37%	7.75%	6.83%	7.62%	5.38%	8.15%	6.58%	5.63%	1.37%
ESDIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund	0.00%	0.39%	4.79%	3.39%	2.50%	2.60%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ESFIX	ESDIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.96%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.82%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESFIX	ESDIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.12%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.26%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	—	—