ESDIX vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ESDIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - ESDIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Ashmore, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESDIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

ESDIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund (ESDIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ESDIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 40.91%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESDIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESDIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund	0.00%	1.54%	6.15%	5.31%	-9.66%	-4.21%	4.12%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	20.41%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	33.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ESDIX and QQQ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2020	0.12

Return for Risk

ESDIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESDIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESDIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund (ESDIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESDIX	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ESDIX	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-82.97%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.99%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.73%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESDIX	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.67%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.64%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.43%	—

ESDIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESDIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESDIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ESDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESDIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Select Fund	0.00%	0.39%	4.79%	3.39%	2.50%	2.60%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.49%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESDIX and QQQ in my portfolio?

ESDIX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.