PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR H (ESEH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEH.DE achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than XU61.DE's 12.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ESEH.DE has outperformed XU61.DE with an annualized return of 12.49%, while XU61.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.


ESEH.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.03%
6M
8.65%
YTD
8.70%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.49%

XU61.DE

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.51%
6M
11.82%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR H
8.70%14.79%22.63%23.30%-21.43%28.68%16.53%27.67%-93.43%1,643.89%
XU61.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR
12.56%17.07%10.27%10.09%-11.67%21.21%-9.09%31.08%-4.17%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEH.DE and XU61.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015

0.61

The correlation between ESEH.DE and XU61.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEH.DE
ESEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ESEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR H (ESEH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESEH.DEXU61.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.37

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

16.20

-7.14

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEH.DE and XU61.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.54%, which is greater than XU61.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEH.DE and XU61.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEH.DEXU61.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.54%

-41.19%

-53.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-5.90%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

-12.73%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-17.58%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.54%

-38.86%

-55.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.43%

-1.85%

-80.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-8.84%

-59.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.59%

+0.59%

Volatility

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR H (ESEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) at 2.23%. This indicates that ESEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XU61.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEH.DEXU61.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.23%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

7.92%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

10.28%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

11.65%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

410.50%

14.17%

+396.33%

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEH.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XU61.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESEH.DE vs. XU61.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESEH.DE nor XU61.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESEH.DE and XU61.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEH.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEH.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XU61.DE.

ESEH.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while XU61.DE is Global Equities. ESEH.DE tracks S&P 500 Composite (EUR Hedged) Net Return Index, while XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ESEH.DE and 0.31% for XU61.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEH.DE and XU61.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer