XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XU61.DE (BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR) and AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XU61.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index, while AMEE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XU61.DE returned 25.57% vs 61.42% for AMEE.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XU61.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AMEE.DE.

Performance

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) and Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XU61.DE achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMEE.DE's 27.83% return.

XU61.DE

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 25.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMEE.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 27.83%
• 6M: 26.99%
• 1Y: 61.42%
• 3Y*: 32.97%
• 5Y*: 28.59%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XU61.DE BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR	12.67%	17.07%	10.27%	7.93%
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc	27.83%	37.58%	15.56%	6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XU61.DE and AMEE.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.57

The correlation between XU61.DE and AMEE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XU61.DE

XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

AMEE.DE

AMEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 91
AMEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AMEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AMEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AMEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) and Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XU61.DE	AMEE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	3.24	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	4.17	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.52	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	7.71	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.45	23.88	-6.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the AMEE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XU61.DE and AMEE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XU61.DE	AMEE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	3.24	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	0.41	+1.39

Drawdowns

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XU61.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.73%, smaller than the maximum AMEE.DE drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XU61.DE and AMEE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XU61.DE	AMEE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.73%	-59.14%	+46.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.90%	-7.92%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-3.54%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-10.65%	+9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	2.56%	-1.10%

Volatility

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) is 3.30%, while Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that XU61.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XU61.DE	AMEE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	7.10%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	14.18%	-6.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	18.89%	-8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.63%	22.25%	-11.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.63%	25.74%	-15.11%

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XU61.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XU61.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XU61.DE nor AMEE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XU61.DE and AMEE.DE in my portfolio?

XU61.DE and AMEE.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XU61.DE or AMEE.DE?

On fees, XU61.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XU61.DE or AMEE.DE?

XU61.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMEE.DE.

What is the main difference between XU61.DE and AMEE.DE?

XU61.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AMEE.DE is Energy Equities. XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index, while AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas Easy and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for XU61.DE and 0.45% for AMEE.DE.