PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEE.DE achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than LOWD.DE's 10.58% return.


ESEE.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.21%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.25%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
15.09%

LOWD.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.62%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESEE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.27%4.37%32.16%22.65%-14.21%18.12%
LOWD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc
10.58%4.27%25.87%26.12%-10.62%17.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.84

The correlation between ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEE.DE
ESEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LOWD.DE
LOWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEE.DELOWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.06

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

6.55

+5.93

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEE.DELOWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.33

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.98

-0.03

Drawdowns

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, which is greater than LOWD.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEE.DELOWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-19.08%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-7.90%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-19.08%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-3.98%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.49%

-0.46%

Volatility

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) is 2.65%, while BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that ESEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEE.DELOWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.29%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

9.56%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

12.24%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

14.21%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

14.21%

+1.88%

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LOWD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESEE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESEE.DE nor LOWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

ESEE.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while LOWD.DE is Global Equities. ESEE.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESEE.DE and 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEE.DE and LOWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer