PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEE.DE achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than EJAP.DE's 16.87% return.


ESEE.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.21%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.25%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
15.09%

EJAP.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.39%
YTD
16.87%
6M
16.66%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESEE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.27%4.37%32.16%22.65%-14.21%40.85%7.14%34.97%-0.85%7.07%
EJAP.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
16.87%11.73%14.53%16.88%-12.11%10.01%5.26%22.39%-93.57%9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.63

The correlation between ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEE.DE
ESEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EJAP.DE
EJAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEE.DEEJAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.86

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

9.27

+3.21

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEE.DEEJAP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.56

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.61

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

-0.49

+1.45

Drawdowns

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum EJAP.DE drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEE.DEEJAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-94.44%

+60.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-10.34%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-16.92%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-18.42%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-86.65%

+86.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-75.83%

+71.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.20%

-1.17%

Volatility

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) is 2.65%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that ESEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EJAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEE.DEEJAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.42%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

15.03%

-7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

19.03%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

16.64%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

34.09%

-18.00%

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESEE.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESEE.DE nor EJAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ESEE.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while EJAP.DE is Japan Equities. ESEE.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEE.DE and EJAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer