ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESEA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and ZA30.DE (iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - ESEA.DE tracks the S&P 500 Index while ZA30.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESEA.DE returned 22.05%/yr vs 21.77%/yr for ZA30.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESEA.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ZA30.DE.

Performance

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESEA.DE is traded in USD, while ZA30.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZA30.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESEA.DE having a 10.05% return and ZA30.DE slightly lower at 9.88%.

ESEA.DE

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 27.25%
• 3Y*: 22.05%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: —

ZA30.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 30.83%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.05%	17.58%	24.90%	26.00%	-0.28%
ZA30.DE iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.86%	18.92%	23.69%	28.02%	0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022	0.92

The correlation between ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA.DE

ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

ZA30.DE

ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESEA.DE	ZA30.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.66	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.82	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	3.47	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	15.08	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESEA.DE	ZA30.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.66	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.46	-0.56

Drawdowns

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, which is greater than ZA30.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESEA.DE	ZA30.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-20.11%	-14.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.22%	-8.83%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.64%	-20.11%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.13%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-2.22%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.04%	-0.12%

Volatility

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) have volatilities of 3.09% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESEA.DE	ZA30.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	2.95%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	8.16%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.69%	11.56%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	14.80%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	14.80%	+3.13%

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESEA.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while ZA30.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	1.06%	0.76%	0.65%	0.00%	1.08%	0.64%	0.67%
ZA30.DE iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ESEA.DE or ZA30.DE?

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESEA.DE or ZA30.DE?

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ESEA.DE.

What is the main difference between ESEA.DE and ZA30.DE?

ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESEA.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.