PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESEA.DE is traded in USD, while EMEH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMEH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEA.DE achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than EMEH.DE's 19.93% return.


ESEA.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
3.24%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.66%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*

EMEH.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
19.93%
6M
24.62%
1Y
46.70%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.05%17.58%24.90%26.00%-19.21%29.94%17.69%11.71%
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
19.91%41.56%0.53%-9.49%5.02%17.08%4.92%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA.DE
ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEH.DE
EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEA.DEEMEH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

4.63

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

15.61

-1.29

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEA.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.50

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

-0.46

+1.37

Drawdowns

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -93.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEA.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-93.42%

+59.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-10.04%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-14.42%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-32.67%

+8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-81.49%

+80.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-82.55%

+77.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.98%

-1.06%

Volatility

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) is 3.09%, while BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ESEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEA.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

4.54%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

16.59%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

18.87%

-7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.31%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

35.51%

-17.58%

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESEA.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while EMEH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.06%0.76%0.65%0.00%1.08%0.64%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

ESEA.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while EMEH.DE is Commodities. ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESEA.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEA.DE and EMEH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer