ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE).

ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESEA.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2013. EJAP.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016. Both ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	-4.61%	17.46%	24.90%	26.00%	-19.21%	29.94%	17.69%	11.71%
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	4.53%	26.14%	7.98%	20.57%	-16.95%	1.33%	15.54%	12.47%

Different Trading Currencies

ESEA.DE is traded in USD, while EJAP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EJAP.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEA.DE achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than EJAP.DE's 4.53% return.

ESEA.DE

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: -4.61%
• 6M: -1.53%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: —

EJAP.DE

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 29.99%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: 7.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ESEA.DE

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF

EJAP.DE

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA.DE

ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 67
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

EJAP.DE

EJAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EJAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EJAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EJAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EJAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESEA.DE	EJAP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.35	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.96	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.67	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	9.74	+1.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESEA.DE	EJAP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.35	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.40	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	-0.51	+1.30

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while EJAP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	0.71%	0.68%	0.65%	0.00%	1.08%	0.64%	0.67%
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum EJAP.DE drawdown of -94.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA.DE and EJAP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESEA.DE	EJAP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-94.44%	+60.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-10.34%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	-18.42%	-5.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-87.84%	+82.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-75.63%	+70.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	3.16%	-1.25%

Volatility

ESEA.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) is 4.57%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that ESEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EJAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESEA.DE	EJAP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	9.21%	-4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	15.94%	-7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	22.16%	-6.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	17.90%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	34.61%	-16.58%