PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESAE.DE achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than LOWD.DE's 8.75% return.


ESAE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.45%
6M
10.98%
YTD
12.72%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.66%

LOWD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.75%
6M
9.87%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
11.96%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
€30.33K€23.68K€29.24K
€29.65K€22.31K€17.68K

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.79

The correlation between ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESAE.DE
ESAE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LOWD.DE
LOWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESAE.DELOWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.51

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

4.30

+6.30

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESAE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESAE.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, smaller than the maximum LOWD.DE drawdown of -19.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESAE.DELOWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-19.08%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-7.90%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-6.61%

+5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-3.91%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.78%

-1.05%

Volatility

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Equal Weight Select UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESAE.DE) is 2.72%, while BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that ESAE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESAE.DELOWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

4.24%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

10.96%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

13.29%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

14.32%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.01%

14.23%

-3.22%

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESAE.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LOWD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESAE.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESAE.DE nor LOWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAE.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAE.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

ESAE.DE tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Ex Business Involvement Screens Select Index, while LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESAE.DE and 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESAE.DE and LOWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer