ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE
ESAD.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) and R8T.DE (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. ESAD.DE is passively managed, while R8T.DE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESAD.DE returned 4.85%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for R8T.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESAD.DE charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for R8T.DE.
Performance
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESAD.DE achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than R8T.DE's 5.83% return.
ESAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 7.67% | -3.81% | 3.54% | 5.36% |
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.83% | -3.97% | 2.59% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESAD.DE and R8T.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESAD.DE and R8T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESAD.DE
R8T.DE
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESAD.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.32 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 0.55 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESAD.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.16 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, which is greater than R8T.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESAD.DE and R8T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESAD.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.37% | -21.76% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | -18.35% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.22% | -21.76% | +4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.52% | -11.79% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.56% | -7.54% | -10.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 10.72% | -7.97% |
Volatility
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESAD.DE | R8T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 9.05% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 24.56% | -12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 18.55% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 18.55% | -3.77% |
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESAD.DE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than R8T.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESAD.DE vs. R8T.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESAD.DE nor R8T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESAD.DE and R8T.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R8T.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R8T.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for ESAD.DE.
They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for ESAD.DE and 0.40% for R8T.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESAD.DE and R8T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer