PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ERX having a 66.93% return and TQQQ slightly lower at 64.46%. Over the past 10 years, ERX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -8.79%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


ERX

1D
2.68%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
66.93%
6M
59.74%
1Y
90.37%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
-8.79%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.93%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and TQQQ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.41

The correlation between ERX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERX vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERX
TQQQ

Energy

100.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Energy

ERX
100.0%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

ERX

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

ERX

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ERX

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

ERX

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Financial Services

ERX

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

ERX

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

ERX

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

ERX

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

ERX

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

ERX

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERXTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.75

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

12.27

-1.67

ERX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERXTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.92

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.43

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

0.69

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.74

-0.83

Drawdowns

ERX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-81.66%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.34%

-36.97%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-58.04%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-81.66%

+34.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-81.66%

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.57%

-0.76%

-90.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.02%

-18.52%

-48.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

11.28%

-2.71%

Volatility

ERX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that ERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.49%

13.29%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.45%

36.04%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.14%

47.60%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.98%

66.53%

-14.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.18%

65.96%

+3.22%

ERX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERX and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -8.79% for ERX. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERX and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer