ERX vs. TQQQ
ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERX returned -9.47%/yr vs 46.45%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
ERX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ERX having a 42.50% return and TQQQ slightly lower at 42.40%. Over the past 10 years, ERX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -9.47%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 46.45% annualized return.
ERX
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 42.50%
- 6M
- 44.57%
- 1Y
- 57.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 24.74%
- 10Y*
- -9.47%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- 42.40%
- 6M
- 35.61%
- 1Y
- 91.80%
- 3Y*
- 60.52%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 46.45%
ERX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 42.50% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 111.91% | -91.60% | 17.13% | -55.94% | -11.60% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 42.40% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERX and TQQQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.41 |
The correlation between ERX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERX vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERX
TQQQ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ERX
TQQQ
Basic Materials
ERX
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
ERX
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
ERX
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
ERX
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
ERX
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
ERX
-
TQQQ
Industrials
ERX
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
ERX
-
TQQQ
Technology
ERX
-
TQQQ
Utilities
ERX
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ERX
TQQQ
ERX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.50 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 7.89 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.54% | -81.66% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.49% | -36.97% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.34% | -58.04% | +15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.90% | -81.66% | +34.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | -81.66% | -16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.81% | -14.07% | -78.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.10% | -18.49% | -48.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.06% | 11.67% | -1.61% |
Volatility
ERX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) is 13.95%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 26.81%. This indicates that ERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 26.81% | -12.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.17% | 43.27% | -9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.76% | 53.22% | -11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.94% | 67.42% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 66.30% | +2.76% |
ERX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than TQQQ's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.79% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.27% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERX and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (26.81%) compared to ERX (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 46.45% vs -9.47% for ERX. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 46.45% return vs -9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.27% for TQQQ.
ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERX and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer