ERO vs. SEZL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ERO (Ero Copper Corp) and SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. ERO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past year, ERO returned 87.56% vs -5.28% for SEZL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ERO vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 109.06% return.

ERO

• 1D: 6.10%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 16.30%
• 1Y: 87.56%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: —

SEZL

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 29.59%
• YTD: 109.06%
• 6M: 88.63%
• 1Y: -5.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERO vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ERO Ero Copper Corp	3.89%	109.87%	-14.63%	-19.60%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	109.06%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ERO and SEZL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023	0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap ERO : $3.09B SEZL : $4.64B
EPS ERO : $2.80 SEZL : $4.15
PE Ratio ERO : 10.51 SEZL : 32.00
PEG Ratio ERO : 0.11 SEZL : 0.06
PS Ratio ERO : 3.32 SEZL : 9.87
PB Ratio ERO : 2.80 SEZL : 23.56
Total Revenue (TTM) ERO : $925.20M SEZL : $480.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) ERO : $394.67M SEZL : $426.79M
EBITDA (TTM) ERO : $528.87M SEZL : $193.18M

Return for Risk

ERO vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERO

ERO Risk / Return Rank: 78
ERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ERO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ERO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERO vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ERO	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-0.06	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	0.55	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.07	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	-0.07	+2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	-0.10	+5.05

ERO vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ERO vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, smaller than the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO and SEZL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ERO	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.17%	-89.95%	+22.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.97%	-72.02%	+34.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.72%	-27.15%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-40.29%	+13.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.75%	53.61%	-35.86%

Volatility

ERO vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

Ero Copper Corp (ERO) has a higher volatility of 26.23% compared to Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) at 17.41%. This indicates that ERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ERO	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.23%	17.41%	+8.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.36%	62.20%	-14.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.06%	87.49%	-29.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.03%	204.57%	-149.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.38%	204.57%	-145.19%

Dividends

ERO vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ERO nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ERO vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ero Copper Corp and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ERO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a gross profit of 103.33M and revenue of 259.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

ERO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported an operating income of 90.17M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

ERO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a net income of 107.26M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ERO and SEZL in my portfolio?

ERO and SEZL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ERO or SEZL?

ERO has higher volatility (26.23%) compared to SEZL (17.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERO dropped -67.17% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.