PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERO vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ERO vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return.


ERO

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.63%
6M
-19.70%
YTD
-4.88%
1Y
99.04%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.63%

LLY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-3.60%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.26%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
37.33%
5Y*
37.67%
10Y*
32.12%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.14M$23.18M$34.06M
$2.62B$2.84B$3.35B

ERO vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERO
Ero Copper Corp
-4.88%109.87%-14.63%14.84%-10.07%-5.73%-10.97%151.68%21.41%52.76%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.26%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%-2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ERO and LLY is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ERO:

$2.81B

LLY:

$1.08T

EPS

ERO:

$2.79

LLY:

$28.16

PE Ratio

ERO:

9.64

LLY:

40.80

PEG Ratio

ERO:

0.10

LLY:

0.82

PS Ratio

ERO:

3.04

LLY:

14.27

PB Ratio

ERO:

2.57

LLY:

32.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

ERO:

$925.20M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ERO:

$394.67M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ERO:

$528.87M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERO vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERO
ERO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERO vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EROLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.44

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

6.60

-1.47

ERO vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERO vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, roughly equal to the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EROLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.17%

-68.24%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.97%

-23.18%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.66%

-34.48%

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.24%

-34.48%

-25.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.24%

-7.02%

-22.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.09%

-19.17%

-7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.36%

8.56%

+10.80%

Volatility

ERO vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Ero Copper Corp (ERO) has a higher volatility of 16.73% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 8.88%. This indicates that ERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EROLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.73%

8.88%

+7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.66%

27.69%

+20.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.44%

38.37%

+20.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.34%

32.64%

+22.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.36%

30.37%

+28.99%

Dividends

ERO vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

ERO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERO
Ero Copper Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

ERO vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ero Copper Corp and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ERO vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ero Copper Corp and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ERO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a gross profit of 103.33M and revenue of 259.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

ERO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported an operating income of 90.17M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

ERO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a net income of 107.26M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ERO and LLY have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERO has higher volatility (16.73%) compared to LLY (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERO dropped -67.17% vs LLY's -68.24%.

ERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERO and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer