PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERO vs. ASM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ERO vs. ASM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than ASM's 2.90% return.


ERO

1D
6.10%
1M
7.81%
YTD
3.89%
6M
16.30%
1Y
95.54%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

ASM

1D
6.86%
1M
-10.50%
YTD
2.90%
6M
7.58%
1Y
79.49%
3Y*
109.07%
5Y*
37.29%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERO vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERO
Ero Copper Corp
3.89%109.87%-14.63%14.84%-10.07%-5.73%-10.97%151.68%21.41%52.76%
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
2.90%604.88%68.13%-22.95%-21.01%-33.77%124.14%-4.92%-54.48%-8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ERO and ASM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.35

Over the past year, ERO and ASM have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ERO:

$3.09B

ASM:

$1.11B

EPS

ERO:

$2.80

ASM:

$0.23

PE Ratio

ERO:

10.51

ASM:

28.13

PEG Ratio

ERO:

0.11

ASM:

0.08

PS Ratio

ERO:

3.32

ASM:

9.37

PB Ratio

ERO:

2.80

ASM:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ERO:

$925.20M

ASM:

$110.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ERO:

$394.67M

ASM:

$59.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

ERO:

$528.87M

ASM:

$55.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERO vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERO
ERO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ASM
ASM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ASM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERO vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EROASMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.39

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

2.95

+2.00

ERO vs. ASM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the ASM Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO and ASM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERO vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, smaller than the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO and ASM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EROASMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.17%

-94.10%

+26.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.97%

-52.40%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.84%

-52.40%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.02%

-67.29%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.72%

-43.15%

+20.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.04%

-63.76%

+36.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.75%

24.57%

-6.82%

Volatility

ERO vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison

Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) have volatilities of 26.23% and 26.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EROASMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.23%

26.77%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.36%

65.36%

-18.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.06%

82.16%

-24.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.03%

66.03%

-11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.38%

69.72%

-10.34%

Dividends

ERO vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ERO nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ERO vs. ASM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ero Copper Corp and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
259.52M
41.41M
(ERO) Total Revenue
(ASM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ERO vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ero Copper Corp and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
39.8%
61.6%
Portfolio components
ERO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a gross profit of 103.33M and revenue of 259.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

ASM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

ERO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported an operating income of 90.17M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

ASM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.

ERO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a net income of 107.26M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.

ASM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ERO and ASM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASM has higher volatility (26.77%) compared to ERO (26.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERO dropped -67.17% vs ASM's -94.10%.

ERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERO and ASM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer