ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L
ERO.L (SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF) and FEUZ.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares) are both Europe Equities funds - ERO.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while FEUZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERO.L returned 10.13%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for FEUZ.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ERO.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FEUZ.L.
Performance
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ERO.L is traded in GBP, while FEUZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEUZ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERO.L achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than FEUZ.L's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ERO.L has underperformed FEUZ.L with an annualized return of 10.13%, while FEUZ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return.
ERO.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
FEUZ.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERO.L SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 6.83% | 25.68% | 3.93% | 13.00% | -3.77% | 16.91% | 2.21% | 19.36% | -9.30% | 14.82% |
FEUZ.L First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares | 12.51% | 48.45% | 3.89% | 9.28% | -9.28% | 13.80% | 1.55% | 16.96% | -15.00% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERO.L and FEUZ.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ERO.L and FEUZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Industrials
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Healthcare
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Technology
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Consumer Defensive
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Consumer Cyclical
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Basic Materials
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Energy
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Utilities
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Communication Services
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Real Estate
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERO.L
FEUZ.L
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERO.L | FEUZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.28 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 12.55 | -6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERO.L | FEUZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.34 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.74 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.79 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.41%, smaller than the maximum FEUZ.L drawdown of -36.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO.L and FEUZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERO.L | FEUZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.41% | -36.68% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -10.35% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -14.10% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -23.27% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.41% | -36.68% | +8.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.11% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -6.25% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.71% | +0.31% |
Volatility
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERO.L | FEUZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.86% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 11.96% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 14.49% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 18.61% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 18.95% | -4.04% |
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERO.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEUZ.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERO.L vs. FEUZ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ERO.L nor FEUZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ERO.L and FEUZ.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERO.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERO.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.L.
ERO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FEUZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ERO.L and 0.80% for FEUZ.L.
Find the right allocation for ERO.L and FEUZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer