PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNU.L vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERNU.L is traded in GBP, while VXUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VXUS values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNU.L achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ERNU.L has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 3.25%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


ERNU.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.77%
YTD
2.00%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
3.25%

VXUS

1D
0.49%
1M
0.75%
YTD
14.27%
6M
15.23%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
2.00%-2.44%7.39%-0.34%13.44%1.53%-2.16%-0.16%7.99%-7.60%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.27%22.92%6.91%10.07%-6.10%10.02%7.41%17.11%-9.35%16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNU.L and VXUS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2013

0.13

The correlation between ERNU.L and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNU.L vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERNU.LVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.06

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

12.27

-9.08

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNU.L and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.55%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNU.L and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNU.LVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.55%

-28.73%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-9.99%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.54%

-13.06%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-14.57%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

-28.73%

+13.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-1.02%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-5.11%

-13.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.49%

-0.74%

Volatility

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) is 1.97%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that ERNU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNU.LVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

5.84%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

11.80%

-7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.48%

13.49%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

13.09%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.32%

15.50%

-6.18%

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNU.L vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than VXUS's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
3.29%4.68%5.46%4.99%1.56%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.67%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNU.L and VXUS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ERNU.L.

ERNU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VXUS is Global Equities. ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNU.L and 0.05% for VXUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNU.L and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer