PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERNU.L is traded in GBP, while ERNA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERNA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNU.L achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than ERNA.L's 2.05% return.


ERNU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.30%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
3.51%

ERNA.L

1D
0.11%
1M
1.27%
YTD
2.05%
6M
1.25%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
2.56%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.86%-2.45%7.39%-0.34%13.45%1.52%-2.17%-0.16%4.39%
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.05%-2.72%7.51%0.22%13.52%1.06%-1.70%-0.73%4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNU.L and ERNA.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.81

The correlation between ERNU.L and ERNA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNA.L
ERNA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNU.LERNA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.05

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

2.88

+0.21

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNU.L and ERNA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNU.LERNA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.58

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Drawdowns

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, roughly equal to the maximum ERNA.L drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNU.L and ERNA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNU.LERNA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-15.54%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-5.06%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.54%

-9.68%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-15.54%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-4.46%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-6.91%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.86%

-0.12%

Volatility

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that ERNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNU.LERNA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

1.82%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

4.89%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

6.50%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

8.42%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

8.73%

+0.61%

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ERNU.L and ERNA.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNU.L vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, while ERNA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNU.L and ERNA.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L and ERNA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNU.L and ERNA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer