PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNS.L vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERNS.L is traded in GBP, while SPHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPHD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ERNS.L has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 2.21%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.20% annualized return.


ERNS.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.95%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
2.21%

SPHD

1D
1.19%
1M
4.58%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.19%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.67%4.84%5.55%4.76%1.53%0.14%0.77%1.28%0.58%0.57%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
10.30%-3.96%20.14%-3.75%12.54%26.17%-12.62%15.68%-0.61%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNS.L and SPHD is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNS.L vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERNS.LSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.41

1.22

+1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.80

2.13

+17.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

111.29

5.25

+106.04

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.39, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNS.L and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNS.LSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-34.51%

+33.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-6.91%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.22%

-14.43%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-17.64%

+17.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

-34.51%

+33.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-5.71%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.80%

-2.76%

Volatility

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.26%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNS.LSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

3.54%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

8.59%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80%

11.31%

-10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

13.75%

-12.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.92%

17.86%

-16.94%

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERNS.L vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than SPHD's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
3.24%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.40%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNS.L and SPHD have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.30% for SPHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer