PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNS.L vs. IS15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than IS15.L's 0.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ERNS.L having a 2.20% annualized return and IS15.L not far ahead at 2.28%.


ERNS.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.96%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
2.20%

IS15.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.58%4.84%5.54%4.76%1.54%0.13%0.77%1.27%0.58%0.57%
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
0.59%6.24%4.89%7.16%-6.09%-0.84%3.38%4.54%-0.48%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNS.L and IS15.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IS15.L
IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNS.LIS15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.39

1.38

+1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.38

2.36

+18.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

108.76

9.07

+99.69

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.30, which is higher than the IS15.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNS.L and IS15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNS.LIS15.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.30

1.77

+3.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.34

0.70

+3.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.38

0.73

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.87

+1.36

Drawdowns

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum IS15.L drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and IS15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNS.LIS15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-12.18%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-1.94%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.22%

-1.94%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-12.18%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

-12.18%

+10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-1.12%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.50%

-0.46%

Volatility

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.36%, while iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNS.LIS15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

1.02%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

2.32%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84%

2.58%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

3.30%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.92%

3.13%

-2.21%

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IS15.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNS.L vs. IS15.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than IS15.L's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
5.65%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
4.54%4.35%4.06%3.05%1.80%1.72%1.81%2.03%2.08%2.15%2.55%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNS.L and IS15.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS15.L.

ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IS15.L is European Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.20% for IS15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and IS15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer