IS15.L vs. SSAC.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).

IS15.L and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IS15.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. It was launched on Mar 30, 2011. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both IS15.L and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF	-0.29%	6.24%	4.89%	7.16%	-6.09%	-0.84%	3.38%	4.54%	-0.48%	1.76%
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)	-0.51%	13.95%	19.63%	16.14%	-8.56%	20.35%	11.80%	22.09%	-4.79%	13.30%

Different Trading Currencies

IS15.L is traded in GBP, while SSAC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS15.L achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly higher than SSAC.L's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IS15.L has underperformed SSAC.L with an annualized return of 2.29%, while SSAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.

IS15.L

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: -0.29%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 2.21%
• 10Y*: 2.29%

SSAC.L

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 18.39%
• 3Y*: 14.71%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IS15.L and SSAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IS15.L

iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF

SSAC.L

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)

Return for Risk

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS15.L

IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SSAC.L

SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IS15.L	SSAC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.31	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.81	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.27	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.62	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	9.89	+2.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS15.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS15.L and SSAC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IS15.L	SSAC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.31	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.82	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.85	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.84	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between IS15.L and SSAC.L is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison

IS15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while SSAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IS15.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF	4.58%	4.35%	4.06%	3.05%	1.80%	1.72%	1.81%	2.03%	2.08%	2.15%	2.55%	2.91%
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS15.L drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, smaller than the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS15.L and SSAC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IS15.L	SSAC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	-25.43%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.94%	-10.30%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.18%	-17.99%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.18%	-25.43%	+13.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-4.04%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-3.54%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	1.86%	-1.45%

Volatility

IS15.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) is 1.61%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that IS15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IS15.L	SSAC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	4.52%	-2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	8.34%	-6.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93%	14.03%	-11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.25%	13.02%	-9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.10%	14.38%	-11.28%