ERNS.L vs. INFR
ERNS.L (iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ERNS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. ERNS.L is actively managed, while INFR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ERNS.L returned 5.10%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for INFR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERNS.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.
Performance
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ERNS.L is traded in GBP, while INFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INFR values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than INFR's 2.43% return.
ERNS.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
INFR
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 1.67% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 4.76% | 0.28% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.43% | 15.16% | -4.59% | -0.06% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERNS.L and INFR is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERNS.L vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank
ERNS.L
INFR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERNS.L | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.41 | 1.21 | +1.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.80 | 1.75 | +18.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 111.29 | 4.70 | +106.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum INFR drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and INFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERNS.L | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -16.73% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.22% | -5.85% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.22% | -13.68% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.17% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -5.23% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 2.15% | -2.11% |
Volatility
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.26%, while ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERNS.L | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 1.80% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.67% | 5.26% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80% | 8.65% | -7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 12.65% | -11.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.92% | 12.65% | -11.73% |
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERNS.L vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison
ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 3.24% | 4.65% | 5.42% | 4.54% | 1.14% | 0.28% | 0.75% | 1.04% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.81% | 0.72% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERNS.L and INFR have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while INFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.59% for INFR.
Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and INFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer