ERND.L vs. UC81.L
ERND.L (iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and UC81.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - ERND.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while UC81.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERND.L returned 2.77%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for UC81.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERND.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for UC81.L.
Performance
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ERND.L is traded in USD, while UC81.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC81.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERND.L achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than UC81.L's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ERND.L has outperformed UC81.L with an annualized return of 2.77%, while UC81.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.
ERND.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
UC81.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERND.L iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.05% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 5.09% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 3.03% | 2.11% | 1.48% |
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.38% | 7.33% | 4.66% | 5.68% | -6.44% | -0.59% | 4.62% | 8.41% | 0.11% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERND.L and UC81.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2014 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERND.L vs. UC81.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERND.L
UC81.L
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERND.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.37 | 1.14 | +1.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.13 | 1.87 | +19.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 103.65 | 6.22 | +97.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERND.L drawdown since its inception was -7.48%, smaller than the maximum UC81.L drawdown of -36.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERND.L and UC81.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERND.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -36.78% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -1.91% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.64% | -2.05% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.06% | -10.99% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.48% | -13.53% | +6.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.66% | +14.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -27.32% | +27.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.58% | -0.54% |
Volatility
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) is 0.21%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that ERND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC81.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERND.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 1.09% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 3.62% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 4.37% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 5.45% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.08% | 5.72% | -3.64% |
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERND.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UC81.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERND.L vs. UC81.L - Dividend Comparison
ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than UC81.L's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERND.L iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.31% | 4.70% | 5.54% | 5.00% | 1.57% | 0.49% | 1.55% | 2.71% | 2.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 0.72% |
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.67% | 5.59% | 4.76% | 3.28% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 2.75% | 2.90% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERND.L and UC81.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERND.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERND.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UC81.L.
ERND.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UC81.L is Corporate Bonds. ERND.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERND.L and 0.18% for UC81.L.
Find the right allocation for ERND.L and UC81.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer