ERND.L vs. TRIA.L
ERND.L (iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and TRIA.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ERND.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while TRIA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ERND.L returned 3.84%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for TRIA.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERND.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TRIA.L.
Performance
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERND.L achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than TRIA.L's 1.82% return.
ERND.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
TRIA.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERND.L iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.05% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 5.09% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 1.07% |
TRIA.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.82% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 0.53% | -0.00% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERND.L and TRIA.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERND.L
TRIA.L
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TRIA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERND.L | TRIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.37 | 2.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.13 | 3.22 | +17.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 103.65 | 9.09 | +94.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERND.L drawdown since its inception was -7.48%, which is greater than TRIA.L's maximum drawdown of -1.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERND.L and TRIA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERND.L | TRIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -1.22% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -1.22% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.64% | -1.22% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.06% | -1.22% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.09% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.43% | -0.39% |
Volatility
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TRIA.L) at 0.11%. This indicates that ERND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERND.L | TRIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.11% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 1.99% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 2.01% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 1.01% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.08% | 0.93% | +1.15% |
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERND.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERND.L vs. TRIA.L - Dividend Comparison
ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while TRIA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERND.L iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.31% | 4.70% | 5.54% | 5.00% | 1.57% | 0.49% | 1.55% | 2.71% | 2.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 0.72% |
TRIA.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERND.L and TRIA.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRIA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRIA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ERND.L.
ERND.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TRIA.L is Government Bonds. ERND.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while TRIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERND.L and 0.06% for TRIA.L.
Find the right allocation for ERND.L and TRIA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer