PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERND.L vs. T1AP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERND.L is traded in USD, while T1AP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the T1AP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERND.L achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than T1AP.L's 1.51% return.


ERND.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.87%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
2.77%

T1AP.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.78%
6M
1.44%
YTD
1.51%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.05%4.84%5.55%5.09%2.03%0.00%1.07%
T1AP.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.51%4.56%5.11%4.43%0.53%0.36%7,647.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ERND.L and T1AP.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERND.L
ERND.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

T1AP.L
T1AP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
T1AP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERND.LT1AP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.37

1.15

+1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.13

2.87

+18.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

103.65

7.96

+95.69

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERND.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.34, which is higher than the T1AP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERND.L and T1AP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERND.L drawdown since its inception was -7.48%, smaller than the maximum T1AP.L drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERND.L and T1AP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERND.LT1AP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-19.42%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-1.32%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.64%

-19.42%

+18.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.06%

-19.42%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.56%

+9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-6.18%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.48%

-0.44%

Volatility

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) is 0.21%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that ERND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T1AP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERND.LT1AP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

1.32%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

4.14%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

4.74%

-3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

14.77%

-13.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.08%

2,980.48%

-2,978.40%

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERND.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than T1AP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERND.L vs. T1AP.L - Dividend Comparison

ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while T1AP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.31%4.70%5.54%5.00%1.57%0.49%1.55%2.71%2.19%1.39%0.99%0.72%
T1AP.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERND.L and T1AP.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, T1AP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

T1AP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ERND.L.

ERND.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while T1AP.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERND.L and 0.06% for T1AP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERND.L and T1AP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer