ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L
ERNA.L (iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ERNA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ERNA.L returned 3.77%/yr vs 24.18%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERNA.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERNA.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return.
ERNA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 13.14%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 51.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.42%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.33%
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNA.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.64% | 4.75% | 5.66% | 5.50% | 1.46% | 0.11% | 1.27% | 3.19% | 1.09% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.04% | 22.93% | 38.51% | 59.45% | -29.15% | 34.09% | 43.14% | 48.90% | -10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERNA.L and IUIT.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERNA.L
IUIT.L
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERNA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.31 | 1.41 | +0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.10 | 3.03 | +18.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.85 | 8.99 | +73.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERNA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65 | 2.55 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.03 | 1.02 | +3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 1.16 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERNA.L drawdown since its inception was -8.63%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNA.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERNA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -33.46% | +24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -17.03% | +16.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.38% | -26.40% | +26.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.81% | -33.46% | +32.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.14% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -6.02% | +5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 5.76% | -5.71% |
Volatility
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) is 0.30%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that ERNA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERNA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 7.49% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 15.53% | -14.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93% | 20.28% | -19.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.93% | 23.61% | -22.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 22.47% | -20.30% |
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERNA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERNA.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ERNA.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ERNA.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIT.L.
ERNA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNA.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for ERNA.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer