ERH vs. WFMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX).
ERH is an actively managed fund by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Apr 30, 2004. WFMIX is managed by Allspring Global Investments.
Performance
ERH vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERH vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 6.54% | 19.85% | 25.71% | -10.52% | -18.38% | 22.14% | -1.15% | 33.97% | -8.98% | 18.32% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 3.16% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERH achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than WFMIX's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ERH has underperformed WFMIX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while WFMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.
ERH
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
WFMIX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERH vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERH has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERH vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank
ERH
WFMIX
ERH vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERH | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.67 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.07 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.06 | +1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 3.71 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERH | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.67 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.45 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERH and WFMIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ERH vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison
ERH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than WFMIX's 10.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 8.00% | 8.13% | 7.15% | 9.19% | 8.09% | 5.86% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 8.06% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.04% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.90% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
ERH vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERH drawdown since its inception was -69.81%, which is greater than WFMIX's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERH and WFMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERH | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.81% | -52.70% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -11.57% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.85% | -22.13% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | -43.80% | -2.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -6.87% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -7.53% | -9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 3.30% | +0.80% |
Volatility
ERH vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERH | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 5.58% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 10.53% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.77% | 17.51% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 17.17% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 18.87% | +0.78% |