ERH vs. BULIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX).
ERH is an actively managed fund by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Apr 30, 2004. BULIX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Feb 28, 1993.
Performance
ERH vs. BULIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERH vs. BULIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 4.55% | 19.85% | 25.71% | -10.52% | -18.38% | 22.14% | -1.15% | 33.97% | -8.98% | 18.32% |
BULIX American Century Utilities Fund | 9.37% | 16.76% | 24.32% | -7.51% | -4.37% | 13.77% | -2.38% | 19.94% | 1.82% | 0.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERH achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than BULIX's 9.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ERH having a 7.07% annualized return and BULIX not far ahead at 7.31%.
ERH
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 19.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.07%
BULIX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERH vs. BULIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERH has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than BULIX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERH vs. BULIX — Risk / Return Rank
ERH
BULIX
ERH vs. BULIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERH | BULIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 2.00 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.89 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 7.19 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERH | BULIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.47 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERH and BULIX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ERH vs. BULIX - Dividend Comparison
ERH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, less than BULIX's 10.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund | 8.15% | 8.13% | 7.15% | 9.19% | 8.09% | 5.86% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 8.06% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.04% |
BULIX American Century Utilities Fund | 10.43% | 11.60% | 2.36% | 2.65% | 7.78% | 7.50% | 7.55% | 2.97% | 6.91% | 7.70% | 6.99% | 5.87% |
Drawdowns
ERH vs. BULIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERH drawdown since its inception was -69.81%, which is greater than BULIX's maximum drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERH and BULIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERH | BULIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.81% | -55.21% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -8.34% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.85% | -24.56% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.11% | -33.86% | -12.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -2.97% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -10.06% | -7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 3.35% | +0.74% |
Volatility
ERH vs. BULIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) at 4.86%. This indicates that ERH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERH | BULIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 4.86% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.76% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 15.50% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 16.57% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 17.99% | +1.65% |