PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERET vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERET vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return.


ERET

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.56%
6M
8.15%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.00%

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.29K$48.12K$74.20K
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

ERET vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
12.18%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ERET and USO is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ERET and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERET vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERET vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERETUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.93

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

5.60

+0.81

ERET vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERET Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERET and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERET vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERETUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-98.19%

+77.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-32.49%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.61%

-32.49%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-86.26%

+84.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-75.38%

+69.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

12.03%

-9.24%

Volatility

ERET vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is 3.53%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that ERET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERETUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

17.73%

-14.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

42.79%

-32.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

46.91%

-34.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

37.06%

-21.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

39.29%

-23.63%

ERET vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERET vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.24%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERET and USO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to ERET (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERET dropped -20.30% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 3-year performance, USO leads with 20.97% vs 9.46% for ERET. On fees, ERET is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ERET has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 20.97% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERET is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

ERET has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

ERET is categorized as REIT, while USO is Oil & Gas. ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ERET and 0.86% for USO.

ERET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERET and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer