ERET vs. SRET
Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET).
ERET and SRET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ERET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index. It was launched on Nov 15, 2022. SRET is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. Both ERET and SRET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ERET vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERET vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 1.58% | 10.26% | 0.60% | 10.25% | 0.29% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | -1.00% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -0.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's -1.00% return.
ERET
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRET
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 8.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERET vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERET vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
ERET
SRET
ERET vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERET | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 0.91 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.12 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.77 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 3.20 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERET | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.04 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERET and SRET is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ERET vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SRET's 8.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.26% | 3.67% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.21% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Drawdowns
ERET vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and SRET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERET | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -66.98% | +46.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -11.13% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.47% | -27.69% | +19.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -22.48% | +16.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.75% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ERET vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is 5.08%, while Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that ERET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERET | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 5.42% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 8.33% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 14.08% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 16.52% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 24.60% | -8.75% |