ERET vs. IBIT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ERET (Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ERET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ERET returned 17.44% vs -43.69% for IBIT. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ERET charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

ERET vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.17% return.

ERET

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 8.69%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 17.44%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.91%

IBIT

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 3.70%
• 6M: -18.23%
• YTD: -27.17%
• 1Y: -43.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF	$79.74K	$48.03K	$74.82K
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	$1.33B	$1.34B	$1.65B

ERET vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF	11.91%	10.26%	1.44%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.17%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ERET and IBIT is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.22

Return for Risk

ERET vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERET

ERET Risk / Return Rank: 52
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 50

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERET vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ERET	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	-0.99	+2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	-1.44	+3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.84	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	-0.82	+2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	-1.26	+7.51

ERET vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERET Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERET and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ERET vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ERET	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-53.30%	+33.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-53.30%	+42.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-49.28%	+47.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-18.29%	+12.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	34.80%	-32.00%

Volatility

ERET vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is 3.32%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that ERET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ERET	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	8.98%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	33.79%	-23.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	44.48%	-32.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.65%	49.57%	-33.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.65%	49.57%	-33.92%

ERET vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ERET vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF	3.25%	3.79%	4.26%	3.67%	0.64%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ERET and IBIT in my portfolio?

ERET and IBIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ERET or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to ERET (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERET dropped -20.30% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, ERET or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, ERET leads with 17.44% vs -43.69% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ERET has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ERET or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, ERET has performed better with a 17.44% return vs -43.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ERET or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ERET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ERET or IBIT?

ERET has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between ERET and IBIT?

ERET is categorized as REIT, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ERET and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.