EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L
EQSG.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. EQSG.L is passively managed, while QQQO.L is actively managed. Over the past year, EQSG.L returned 41.07% vs 32.75% for QQQO.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQSG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.
Performance
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQSG.L achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly higher than QQQO.L's 15.53% return.
EQSG.L
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 41.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.92%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 32.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQSG.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.91% | 11.73% | 16.29% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 15.53% | 6.57% | 12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQSG.L and QQQO.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EQSG.L and QQQO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQSG.L
QQQO.L
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQSG.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 4.71 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 11.27 | -9.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQSG.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.37 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.18 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQSG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQSG.L and QQQO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQSG.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.87% | -21.70% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.73% | -7.04% | -23.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.55% | -0.66% | -9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.16% | -4.40% | -8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.86% | 2.95% | +15.91% |
Volatility
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that EQSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQSG.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 3.90% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 8.93% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.57% | 14.00% | +30.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 17.34% | +18.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.99% | 17.34% | +17.65% |
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQSG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQSG.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison
EQSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EQSG.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 67.52% | 124.53% | 17.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQSG.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQSG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQSG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQO.L.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQSG.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.
Find the right allocation for EQSG.L and QQQO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer