EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE
EQQQ.DE (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and CLOD.DE (Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CLOD.DE is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco. EQQQ.DE is passively managed, while CLOD.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, EQQQ.DE returned 37.03% vs 3.40% for CLOD.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQQQ.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CLOD.DE.
Performance
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.DE achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than CLOD.DE's 1.46% return.
EQQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 37.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 21.28%
CLOD.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 20.52% | 3.63% |
CLOD.DE Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist | 1.46% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQQ.DE and CLOD.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EQQQ.DE
CLOD.DE
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQQ.DE | CLOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.92 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 9.97 | -6.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 35.80 | -24.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQQ.DE | CLOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.49 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.85 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.04%, which is greater than CLOD.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.DE and CLOD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQQ.DE | CLOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.04% | -0.62% | -46.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -0.34% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | 0.00% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -0.10% | -7.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 0.09% | +3.30% |
Volatility
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) at 0.30%. This indicates that EQQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQQQ.DE | CLOD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 0.30% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 0.71% | +10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 0.98% | +14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 1.07% | +18.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 1.07% | +18.58% |
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQQ.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOD.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQQQ.DE vs. CLOD.DE - Dividend Comparison
EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CLOD.DE's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOD.DE Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist | 3.30% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.37% | 0.39% | 0.57% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.78% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQQQ.DE and CLOD.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.
EQQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CLOD.DE is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.DE and 0.25% for CLOD.DE.
Find the right allocation for EQQQ.DE and CLOD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer