EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L
EQQD.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQQD.L returned 28.25%/yr vs 36.69%/yr for XLKS.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQQD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQD.L achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 23.53% return.
EQQD.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- YTD
- 23.53%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 52.93%
- 3Y*
- 36.69%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 26.28%
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 19.77% | 19.91% | 26.75% | 56.61% | -33.32% | 15.15% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 23.53% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 60.64% | -29.12% | 20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQD.L and XLKS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EQQD.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
Communication Services
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Healthcare
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Industrials
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
Utilities
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Basic Materials
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Energy
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Financial Services
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
Real Estate
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQQD.L
XLKS.L
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.10 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 9.28 | +3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.04 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQD.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -34.26% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -16.99% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -26.97% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -3.15% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -5.09% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 5.69% | -2.64% |
Volatility
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) is 5.03%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that EQQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQQD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 7.45% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 15.54% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 20.19% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 23.80% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 22.04% | -1.25% |
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQQD.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EQQD.L and XLKS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQQD.L.
EQQD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQD.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for EQQD.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer