EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L
EQQD.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - EQQD.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD while ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQQD.L returned 28.25%/yr vs 28.06%/yr for ANXG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQQD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EQQD.L is traded in USD, while ANXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQQD.L having a 19.77% return and ANXG.L slightly lower at 19.59%.
EQQD.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 8.72%
- YTD
- 19.59%
- 6M
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.72%
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 19.77% | 19.91% | 26.75% | 56.61% | -33.32% | 15.15% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.59% | 20.12% | 26.56% | 55.81% | -33.39% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQD.L and ANXG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EQQD.L and ANXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Communication Services
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Consumer Defensive
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Healthcare
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Industrials
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Utilities
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Basic Materials
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Energy
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Financial Services
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Real Estate
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQQD.L
ANXG.L
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.66 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 13.38 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.66 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.12 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXG.L drawdown of -35.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQD.L and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -35.18% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -11.02% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -23.10% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.78% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -6.07% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.02% | +0.03% |
Volatility
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 4.31%. This indicates that EQQD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQQD.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.31% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 11.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 15.15% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 20.44% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 19.82% | +0.97% |
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQQD.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQQD.L and ANXG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQQD.L.
EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQD.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for EQQD.L and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer