PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNIX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNIX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 17.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EQNIX has outperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


EQNIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.65%
YTD
12.78%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
12.61%

LEXCX

1D
0.99%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
17.73%
6M
16.12%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
12.78%16.90%12.89%16.23%-6.97%26.35%8.59%25.72%-7.55%19.34%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
17.73%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNIX and LEXCX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between EQNIX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNIX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNIX
EQNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EQNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQNIXLEXCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

1.78

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

2.72

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

4.38

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.87

11.33

+2.55

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNIX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQNIXLEXCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.78

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.63

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.53

+0.23

Drawdowns

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNIX drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, smaller than the maximum LEXCX drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNIX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNIXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-50.42%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-6.22%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-14.03%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-19.75%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-39.21%

+2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-3.36%

+3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-7.12%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.40%

-0.39%

Volatility

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) is 2.99%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that EQNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNIXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

4.51%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.45%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

13.83%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

16.50%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.99%

-1.85%

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQNIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQNIX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

EQNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than LEXCX's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
10.79%12.17%6.60%4.05%6.24%8.38%3.71%2.29%7.27%4.75%2.42%2.89%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.40%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQNIX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to EQNIX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNIX dropped -36.60% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

EQNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNIX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer