EQLT vs. TJUN
EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - EQLT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, EQLT returned 61.62% vs 18.22% for TJUN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQLT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
EQLT vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQLT achieves a 33.07% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.75% return.
EQLT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 33.07%
- 6M
- 34.67%
- 1Y
- 61.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 18.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQLT vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 33.07% | 21.46% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.75% | 11.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQLT and TJUN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQLT vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
EQLT
TJUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EQLT vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQLT | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQLT vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQLT drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLT and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQLT | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.38% | -4.47% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -4.47% | -7.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -0.57% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility
EQLT vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQLT | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 7.35% | +15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 7.35% | +13.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 7.35% | +13.74% |
EQLT vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQLT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQLT vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 2.51% | 3.10% | 0.51% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQLT and TJUN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 61.62% vs 18.22% for TJUN. On fees, EQLT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 61.62% return vs 18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQLT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
EQLT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQLT and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for EQLT and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer