PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLT vs. SEIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLT achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than SEIQ's 8.95% return.


EQLT

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.62%
6M
19.56%
YTD
28.39%
1Y
48.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.90%

SEIQ

1D
0.36%
1M
4.77%
6M
8.79%
YTD
8.95%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$81.83K$62.05K$114.88K
$1.93M$2.99M$2.13M

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EQLT and SEIQ is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.43

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQLT
SEIQ

Technology

34.8%
34.1%

Financial Services

19.5%
10.3%

Industrials

11.4%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
10.0%

Basic Materials

6.5%
0.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
13.1%

Energy

3.5%

-

Healthcare

3.3%
19.4%

Utilities

1.8%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

EQLT
34.8%
SEIQ
34.1%

Financial Services

EQLT
19.5%
SEIQ
10.3%

Industrials

EQLT
11.4%
SEIQ
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EQLT
8.2%
SEIQ
10.0%

Basic Materials

EQLT
6.5%
SEIQ
0.9%

Communication Services

EQLT
5.2%
SEIQ
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

EQLT
3.5%
SEIQ
13.1%

Energy

EQLT
3.5%
SEIQ

-

Healthcare

EQLT
3.3%
SEIQ
19.4%

Utilities

EQLT
1.8%
SEIQ

-

Real Estate

EQLT
0.9%
SEIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQLT vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQLT
EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIQ
SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQLTSEIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

1.66

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

6.30

+5.90

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLT and SEIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLT drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, which is greater than SEIQ's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLT and SEIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLTSEIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-14.87%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-9.66%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

0.00%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-2.68%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

2.55%

+1.45%

Volatility

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) at 4.18%. This indicates that EQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLTSEIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

4.18%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

9.25%

+11.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.55%

11.50%

+12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

14.58%

+6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

14.58%

+6.73%

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQLT vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than SEIQ's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EQLT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
2.73%3.10%0.51%0.00%0.00%
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%0.97%1.08%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQLT and SEIQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQLT has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to SEIQ (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQLT dropped -17.38% vs SEIQ's -14.87%.

On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 48.63% vs 16.00% for SEIQ. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 48.63% return vs 16.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQLT.

EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.88% for SEIQ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQLT and 0.15% for SEIQ.

EQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQLT and SEIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer