PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLT vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQLT vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQLT vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQLT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
4.18%33.93%-1.29%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.93%12.66%6.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLT achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return.


EQLT

1D
3.39%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
4.18%
6M
9.95%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWM

1D
3.50%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.02%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQLT vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQLT vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQLT
EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQLT vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLTIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.11

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

1.66

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.82

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.08

6.76

+4.32

EQLT vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLT and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLTIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.11

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.34

+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between EQLT and IWM is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EQLT vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQLT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
2.97%3.10%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.02%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Drawdowns

EQLT vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLT drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLT and IWM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLTIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-59.05%

+41.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-13.74%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-7.91%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-10.83%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.70%

-0.68%

Volatility

EQLT vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that EQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQLTIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.92%

7.47%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

14.47%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

23.18%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

22.55%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

22.99%

-3.98%