PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLT vs. DEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQLT vs. DEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLT achieves a 31.35% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 19.97% return.


EQLT

1D
-1.96%
1M
8.08%
YTD
31.35%
6M
34.63%
1Y
61.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DEM

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.63%
YTD
19.97%
6M
20.75%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQLT vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EQLT and DEM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024

0.84

The correlation between EQLT and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQLT vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQLT
DEM

Technology

40.7%
17.4%

Financial Services

16.8%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
5.0%

Industrials

7.4%
9.5%

Basic Materials

6.7%
3.5%

Communication Services

6.4%
3.0%

Energy

3.8%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.8%

Healthcare

2.4%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.0%

Technology

EQLT
40.7%
DEM
17.4%

Financial Services

EQLT
16.8%
DEM
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EQLT
9.0%
DEM
5.0%

Industrials

EQLT
7.4%
DEM
9.5%

Basic Materials

EQLT
6.7%
DEM
3.5%

Communication Services

EQLT
6.4%
DEM
3.0%

Energy

EQLT
3.8%
DEM
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

EQLT
3.3%
DEM
5.8%

Healthcare

EQLT
2.4%
DEM
0.6%

Utilities

EQLT
2.4%
DEM
3.0%

Real Estate

EQLT
1.1%
DEM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQLT vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQLT
EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQLT vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLTDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.43

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

4.10

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.74

14.52

+6.22

EQLT vs. DEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the DEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLT and DEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLTDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.38

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.22

+1.61

Drawdowns

EQLT vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLT drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLT and DEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLTDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-51.85%

+34.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-7.89%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.19%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-12.90%

+9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

EQLT vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.64%. This indicates that EQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLTDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

5.64%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

11.33%

+7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

13.59%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

15.33%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

17.96%

+2.60%

EQLT vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQLT vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison

EQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than DEM's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
3.76%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
EQLT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
2.63%3.10%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQLT and DEM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQLT has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQLT dropped -17.38% vs DEM's -51.85%.

On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 61.52% vs 32.23% for DEM. On fees, EQLT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 61.52% return vs 32.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQLT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.63% for EQLT.

EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQLT and 0.63% for DEM.

EQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQLT and DEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer