PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLI.TO achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly lower than PXS.TO's 18.28% return.


EQLI.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
4.29%
YTD
12.23%
6M
11.91%
1Y
21.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PXS.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.66%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.18%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
16.09%
10Y*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
12.23%6.41%7.17%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
18.28%13.64%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EQLI.TO and PXS.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

0.37

The correlation between EQLI.TO and PXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQLI.TO
PXS.TO

Technology

21.5%
24.6%

Industrials

14.1%
8.8%

Financial Services

13.9%
14.7%

Healthcare

11.0%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.8%

Real Estate

6.0%
2.4%

Utilities

5.5%
2.8%

Energy

4.0%
7.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
9.7%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.3%

Technology

EQLI.TO
21.5%
PXS.TO
24.6%

Industrials

EQLI.TO
14.1%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Financial Services

EQLI.TO
13.9%
PXS.TO
14.7%

Healthcare

EQLI.TO
11.0%
PXS.TO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EQLI.TO
10.0%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

EQLI.TO
6.3%
PXS.TO
5.8%

Real Estate

EQLI.TO
6.0%
PXS.TO
2.4%

Utilities

EQLI.TO
5.5%
PXS.TO
2.8%

Energy

EQLI.TO
4.0%
PXS.TO
7.7%

Communication Services

EQLI.TO
3.9%
PXS.TO
9.7%

Basic Materials

EQLI.TO
3.9%
PXS.TO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQLI.TO
EQLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQLI.TOPXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.64

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

7.45

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

26.52

-11.07

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLI.TO and PXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.56%, smaller than the maximum PXS.TO drawdown of -31.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLI.TO and PXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLI.TOPXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.56%

-31.87%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-4.88%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-3.35%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.37%

+0.04%

Volatility

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) is 2.38%, while Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that EQLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLI.TOPXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

3.28%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

8.35%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

11.07%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

13.29%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

15.28%

-3.25%

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PXS.TO's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQLI.TO vs. PXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than PXS.TO's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
8.08%8.74%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
1.22%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQLI.TO and PXS.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQLI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQLI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

EQLI.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while PXS.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. EQLI.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EQLI.TO and 0.46% for PXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQLI.TO and PXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer