EQL vs. USPX
EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQL returned 12.66%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for USPX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
EQL vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 7.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQL having a 12.66% annualized return and USPX not far behind at 12.60%.
EQL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
USPX
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
EQL vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 8.44% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 7.94% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -7.78% | 23.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and USPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EQL and USPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQL vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL
USPX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
EQL
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
EQL
USPX
Real Estate
EQL
USPX
Communication Services
EQL
USPX
Healthcare
EQL
USPX
Consumer Defensive
EQL
USPX
Financial Services
EQL
USPX
Industrials
EQL
USPX
Utilities
EQL
USPX
Energy
EQL
USPX
Basic Materials
EQL
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
USPX
EQL vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQL | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.55 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 11.19 | -0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQL vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -31.21% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -9.15% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -19.21% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | -24.60% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -31.21% | -4.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -3.17% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -4.43% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 2.08% | -0.48% |
Volatility
EQL vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 3.08%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 4.89% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 10.06% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 12.74% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 16.28% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 15.96% | +0.58% |
EQL vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQL vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than USPX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.63% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL and USPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USPX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to EQL (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 10-year performance, EQL leads with 12.66% vs 12.60% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQL has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.83% for USPX.
EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.03% for USPX.
EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQL and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer