PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 9.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQL having a 12.39% annualized return and USPX not far behind at 12.14%.


EQL

1D
0.57%
1M
0.31%
6M
6.82%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
13.49%

USPX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.02%
6M
8.24%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.33M$2.84M$2.70M
$3.15M$2.94M$3.73M

EQL vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
10.71%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
9.67%17.78%24.97%27.07%-18.88%19.53%9.72%26.60%-7.78%23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and USPX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.81

The correlation between EQL and USPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQL
USPX

Technology

10.2%
37.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.8%

Healthcare

9.4%
9.4%

Utilities

9.4%
2.6%

Industrials

9.3%
7.9%

Financial Services

9.1%
12.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
4.7%

Energy

8.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

8.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.7%

Technology

EQL
10.2%
USPX
37.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQL
9.6%
USPX
8.8%

Healthcare

EQL
9.4%
USPX
9.4%

Utilities

EQL
9.4%
USPX
2.6%

Industrials

EQL
9.3%
USPX
7.9%

Financial Services

EQL
9.1%
USPX
12.5%

Communication Services

EQL
8.9%
USPX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

EQL
8.8%
USPX
4.7%

Energy

EQL
8.7%
USPX
3.4%

Real Estate

EQL
8.7%
USPX
1.8%

Basic Materials

EQL
8.0%
USPX
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQL vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQLUSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.04

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

8.56

+2.33

EQL vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and USPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQL vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and USPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-31.21%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-9.15%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-19.21%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

-24.60%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-31.21%

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-1.63%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-4.40%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.18%

-0.60%

Volatility

EQL vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 2.23%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

3.39%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

10.23%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

13.02%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

16.30%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

15.97%

+0.52%

EQL vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQL vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than USPX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.35%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.09%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL and USPX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USPX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to EQL (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs USPX's -31.21%.

On 10-year performance, EQL leads with 12.39% vs 12.14% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EQL has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.09% for USPX.

EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.03% for USPX.

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL and USPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer