EQL vs. UJUN
EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and UJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index while UJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQL returned 10.49%/yr vs 6.38%/yr for UJUN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UJUN.
Performance
EQL vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than UJUN's 3.32% return.
EQL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
UJUN
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 10.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- —
EQL vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 8.83% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 15.38% |
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June | 3.32% | 10.63% | 12.49% | 12.17% | -8.86% | 5.09% | 7.15% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL and UJUN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EQL and UJUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQL vs. UJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL
UJUN
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
EQL
UJUN
Consumer Cyclical
EQL
UJUN
Real Estate
EQL
UJUN
Communication Services
EQL
UJUN
Utilities
EQL
UJUN
Financial Services
EQL
UJUN
Consumer Defensive
EQL
UJUN
Industrials
EQL
UJUN
Energy
EQL
UJUN
Healthcare
EQL
UJUN
Basic Materials
EQL
UJUN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank
EQL
UJUN
EQL vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQL | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.55 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.55 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.93 | 21.84 | -9.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQL | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.40 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.77 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.77 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
EQL vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than UJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and UJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -13.73% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -2.84% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -11.24% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | -11.96% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.30% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -2.07% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 0.46% | +1.12% |
Volatility
EQL vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN) at 0.41%. This indicates that EQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 0.41% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 3.25% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.34% | 4.25% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 8.32% | +6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 8.77% | +7.77% |
EQL vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQL vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison
EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL and UJUN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQL has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to UJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs UJUN's -13.73%.
On 5-year performance, EQL leads with 10.49% vs 6.38% for UJUN. On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, UJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.
EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while UJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.79% for UJUN.
UJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQL and UJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer