PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than TPU.TO's 12.48% return.


EQL.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
5.96%
YTD
10.79%
6M
9.50%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*

TPU.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.38%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
16.57%
10Y*
16.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
10.79%5.94%27.38%19.69%1.21%37.03%21.67%31.63%-4.48%
TPU.TO
TD U.S. Equity Index ETF
12.48%12.69%34.82%24.24%-14.31%26.02%18.73%25.02%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL.TO and TPU.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018

0.78

The correlation between EQL.TO and TPU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQL.TO
TPU.TO

Technology

18.3%
35.3%

Industrials

14.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

14.4%
11.5%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.8%

Utilities

6.1%
2.3%

Energy

4.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
11.5%

Technology

EQL.TO
18.3%
TPU.TO
35.3%

Industrials

EQL.TO
14.7%
TPU.TO
8.6%

Financial Services

EQL.TO
14.4%
TPU.TO
11.5%

Healthcare

EQL.TO
10.9%
TPU.TO
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EQL.TO
10.3%
TPU.TO
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

EQL.TO
6.5%
TPU.TO
4.8%

Real Estate

EQL.TO
6.2%
TPU.TO
1.8%

Utilities

EQL.TO
6.1%
TPU.TO
2.3%

Energy

EQL.TO
4.6%
TPU.TO
3.6%

Basic Materials

EQL.TO
4.1%
TPU.TO
1.8%

Communication Services

EQL.TO
4.0%
TPU.TO
11.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL.TO
EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TPU.TO
TPU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TPU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQL.TOTPU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.44

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

12.86

-1.93

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the TPU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL.TO and TPU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQL.TOTPU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.53

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.09

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.97

+0.08

Drawdowns

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than TPU.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and TPU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQL.TOTPU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-27.96%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-8.68%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-19.30%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

-23.73%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.27%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-3.96%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.32%

-0.44%

Volatility

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) at 3.23%. This indicates that EQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQL.TOTPU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.23%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.83%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

11.81%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

15.31%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

16.60%

+0.75%

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TPU.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than TPU.TO's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
1.26%1.38%5.37%8.14%8.91%7.19%9.96%8.29%1.35%0.00%0.00%
TPU.TO
TD U.S. Equity Index ETF
0.85%0.96%0.90%1.22%1.34%0.99%1.23%1.23%1.57%1.59%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL.TO and TPU.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPU.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPU.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQL.TO.

EQL.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while TPU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while TPU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQL.TO and 0.06% for TPU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL.TO and TPU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer