EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO
EQL.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD) and TPU.TO (TD U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while TPU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQL.TO returned 16.55%/yr vs 16.57%/yr for TPU.TO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQL.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TPU.TO.
Performance
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than TPU.TO's 12.48% return.
EQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- —
TPU.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD | 10.79% | 5.94% | 27.38% | 19.69% | 1.21% | 37.03% | 21.67% | 31.63% | -4.48% |
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 12.48% | 12.69% | 34.82% | 24.24% | -14.31% | 26.02% | 18.73% | 25.02% | -1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQL.TO and TPU.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EQL.TO and TPU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Industrials
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Financial Services
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Healthcare
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Consumer Defensive
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Real Estate
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Utilities
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Energy
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Basic Materials
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Communication Services
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EQL.TO
TPU.TO
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQL.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.44 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 12.86 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQL.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.53 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than TPU.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and TPU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQL.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -27.96% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.73% | -8.68% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -19.30% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.60% | -23.73% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.27% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -3.96% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.32% | -0.44% |
Volatility
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) at 3.23%. This indicates that EQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQL.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.23% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 8.83% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 11.81% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 15.31% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 16.60% | +0.75% |
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TPU.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQL.TO vs. TPU.TO - Dividend Comparison
EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than TPU.TO's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD | 1.26% | 1.38% | 5.37% | 8.14% | 8.91% | 7.19% | 9.96% | 8.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 0.99% | 1.23% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQL.TO and TPU.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPU.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPU.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQL.TO.
EQL.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while TPU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while TPU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQL.TO and 0.06% for TPU.TO.
Find the right allocation for EQL.TO and TPU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer