PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
1.77%5.94%9.86%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
-2.67%12.64%11.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's -2.67% return.


EQL.TO

1D
2.02%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.79%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*

QQCI.TO

1D
2.68%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
0.24%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL.TO
EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQL.TOQQCI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.49

1.12

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.54

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.62

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.92

5.92

-3.00

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL.TO and QQCI.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQL.TOQQCI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.12

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.85

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between EQL.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than QQCI.TO's 9.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
1.37%1.38%5.37%8.14%8.91%7.19%9.96%8.29%1.35%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
9.81%9.34%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQL.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-18.95%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.01%

-10.79%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-5.14%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-3.37%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.95%

+0.47%

Volatility

EQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) is 4.61%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQL.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.86%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

10.74%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

16.42%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

15.77%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

15.77%

+1.69%