EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) and LQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - EQGB.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while LQQ3.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQGB.L returned 16.35%/yr vs 28.14%/yr for LQQ3.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EQGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LQQ3.L.

Performance

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQGB.L achieves a 18.86% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ3.L's 56.49% return.

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 18.86%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 39.13%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: —

LQQ3.L

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 27.07%
• YTD: 56.49%
• 6M: 51.01%
• 1Y: 126.98%
• 3Y*: 59.92%
• 5Y*: 28.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	18.86%	19.59%	26.12%	53.92%	-35.07%	27.68%	45.43%	34.93%	-2.60%	5.50%
LQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged	56.49%	18.96%	62.50%	192.06%	-77.11%	89.86%	102.98%	121.83%	-16.83%	13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EQGB.L and LQQ3.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017	0.98

The correlation between EQGB.L and LQQ3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LQQ3.L

LQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
LQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQGB.L	LQQ3.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.80	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.18	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.40	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.54	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	10.50	+1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQGB.L and LQQ3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQGB.L	LQQ3.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.80	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.47	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.66	+0.25

Drawdowns

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, smaller than the maximum LQQ3.L drawdown of -79.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQGB.L and LQQ3.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQGB.L	LQQ3.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.77%	-79.16%	+42.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-35.64%	+24.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	-58.39%	+35.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.77%	-79.16%	+42.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-1.98%	+1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-23.34%	+15.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	12.04%	-8.87%

Volatility

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) is 4.92%, while WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that EQGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQGB.L	LQQ3.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	13.74%	-8.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	32.87%	-20.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	45.12%	-29.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	59.25%	-38.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	59.45%	-38.20%

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQGB.L vs. LQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQGB.L nor LQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
LQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQGB.L and LQQ3.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, EQGB.L and LQQ3.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EQGB.L or LQQ3.L?

On fees, EQGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQGB.L or LQQ3.L?

EQGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQQ3.L.

What is the main difference between EQGB.L and LQQ3.L?

EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQGB.L and 0.75% for LQQ3.L.