EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD) and ZPH.TO (BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EQCL.TO returned 26.79% vs 7.85% for ZPH.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQCL.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZPH.TO.

Performance

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCL.TO achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than ZPH.TO's 1.91% return.

EQCL.TO

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -0.68%
• 6M: 8.99%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZPH.TO

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 1Y: 7.85%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: 5.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EQCL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD	13.63%	16.95%	24.04%	4.98%
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	1.91%	9.47%	4.21%	7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.53

The correlation between EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQCL.TO	ZPH.TO
Technology	25.6%	42.2%
Financial Services	20.5%	17.2%
Industrials	10.8%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	2.7%
Communication Services	7.3%	5.7%
Energy	6.5%	-
Healthcare	6.3%	17.1%
Basic Materials	5.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	8.3%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCL.TO

EQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ZPH.TO

ZPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 41
ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ZPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ZPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ZPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
ZPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EQCL.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.20	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	1.75	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	1.30	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	4.90	+8.29

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum ZPH.TO drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCL.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-33.38%	+14.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-6.07%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-0.72%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-4.22%	+2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	1.61%	+0.43%

Volatility

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) at 2.40%. This indicates that EQCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQCL.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	2.40%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	5.69%	+6.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.87%	6.59%	+7.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.11%	11.18%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.11%	12.59%	+2.52%

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCL.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPH.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQCL.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than ZPH.TO's 10.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQCL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD	10.91%	11.51%	10.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	10.40%	10.06%	9.95%	8.18%	8.83%	7.27%	7.67%	7.26%	6.98%	5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO in my portfolio?

EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQCL.TO or ZPH.TO?

On fees, ZPH.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQCL.TO or ZPH.TO?

ZPH.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for EQCL.TO.

What is the main difference between EQCL.TO and ZPH.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for EQCL.TO and 0.65% for ZPH.TO.