PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQCC.TO is traded in CAD, while HBIL-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HBIL-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL-U.TO's 3.86% return.


EQCC.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.00%
6M
8.38%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL-U.TO

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
2.21%
YTD
3.86%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EQCC.TO and HBIL-U.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCC.TO
EQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL-U.TO
HBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQCC.TOHBIL-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.65

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

4.19

+7.57

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCC.TO and HBIL-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than HBIL-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and HBIL-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQCC.TOHBIL-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-6.68%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-4.01%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.20%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-2.26%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.58%

+0.36%

Volatility

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) at 1.82%. This indicates that EQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQCC.TOHBIL-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

1.82%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

3.60%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

4.68%

+7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

5.85%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

5.85%

+7.96%

Dividends

EQCC.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than HBIL-U.TO's 6.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQCC.TO and HBIL-U.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBIL-U.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQCC.TO and HBIL-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer