EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO
EQCC.TO (Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EQCC.TO returned 28.46% vs 123.99% for GOGY.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQCC.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GOGY.TO.
Performance
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly lower than GOGY.TO's 14.33% return.
EQCC.TO
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 12.84%
- 6M
- 12.97%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | 12.84% | 12.02% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 80.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQCC.TO and GOGY.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EQCC.TO
GOGY.TO
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQCC.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.62 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 6.19 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 22.77 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQCC.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 4.08 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 2.31 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, smaller than the maximum GOGY.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and GOGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQCC.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -20.87% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -20.14% | +12.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.57% | +10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -5.07% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 5.47% | -3.62% |
Volatility
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) is 6.07%, while Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that EQCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQCC.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 9.16% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 21.42% | -12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 30.67% | -19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 34.61% | -20.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 34.61% | -20.67% |
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GOGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQCC.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than GOGY.TO's 12.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | 8.68% | 9.43% | 5.38% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQCC.TO and GOGY.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EQCC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EQCC.TO and 0.40% for GOGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for EQCC.TO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer